- Home
- About us
-
Our work
- Elections
- Civil society
- Rule of law
- Democratic governance
- Legislative support
- Freedom of religion or belief
- Freedom of peaceful assembly
- Gender-based violence
- Human rights defenders
- Human rights and new technologies
- Human rights and gender-responsive security sector
- Human rights and anti-terrorism
- Migration and freedom of movement
- National human rights institutions
- Torture
- Trafficking in human beings
- Hate crime
- People with disabilities
- Racism, xenophobia and discrimination
- Roma and Sinti
- Gender equality
- Special meetings
- News
- Events
- Resources
Election observation mission
Presidential Election, 4 December 2005
In response to an invitation from Kazakhstan's Foreign Ministry, ODIHR deployed an election observation mission for the 4 December presidential election.
Headed by Ambassador Audrey Glover of the United Kingdom, the mission consisted of 13 international staff based in Astana and Almaty and 28 long-term observers deployed throughout the country.
For election day, the mission was joined by 411 short-term observers, including 45 representatives of the OSCE Parliamentary Assembly, seven from the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe, and 16 from the European Parliament.
According to the mission's final report: "The 4 December presidential election was the second multi-candidate election in the Republic of Kazakhstan since independence in 1991. A field of five candidates were registered through a process which was mostly inclusive and provided voters with an opportunity for choice. However, a number of significant shortcomings during the election campaign limited the possibility for a meaningful competition whereby all candidates could enjoy equal opportunities to convey their views to the electorate. Such shortcomings occurred despite the 9 September Presidential Decree on Realization of Election Rights of Citizens of the Republic of Kazakhstan instructing various State authorities to ensure free, fair and competitive elections.
"Shortcomings included undue involvement of the authorities in the election campaign, undue restrictions on campaigning, cases of harassment of campaign staff and an atmosphere of intimidation. While venues for indoor campaign events were allocated to all candidates, requests for outdoor meetings were rarely approved by local executive authorities. Meetings of opposition candidates were on occasion disrupted. There was reported pressure on workers of some state and private companies, and on students, to vote for the incumbent. Statements by the Minister of Interior and National Security Council alleging the opposition was preparing for violent action further heightened tensions prior to election day."