- Home
- About us
-
Our work
- Elections
- Civil society
- Rule of law
- Democratic governance
- Legislative support
- Freedom of religion or belief
- Freedom of peaceful assembly
- Gender-based violence
- Human rights defenders
- Human rights and new technologies
- Human rights and gender-responsive security sector
- Human rights and anti-terrorism
- Migration and freedom of movement
- National human rights institutions
- Torture
- Trafficking in human beings
- Hate crime
- People with disabilities
- Racism, xenophobia and discrimination
- Roma and Sinti
- Gender equality
- Special meetings
- News
- Events
- Resources
News Item
OSCE/ODIHR report says Monaco’s parliamentary elections administered professionally, but some aspects of the legal framework could benefit from further review
The parliamentary elections in the Principality of Monaco on 10 February 2013 took place in a competitive environment and were administered professionally. Candidate registration was inclusive and the campaign was vibrant and competitive. However, further steps could be taken to bring the electoral process closer in line with OSCE commitments, concludes the final report by the OSCE Office for Democratic Institutions and Human Rights (ODIHR)...
- Issued on:
- Issued by:
- OSCE Office for Democratic Institutions and Human Rights
- Fields of work:
- Elections
The parliamentary elections in the Principality of Monaco on 10 February 2013 took place in a competitive environment and were administered professionally. Candidate registration was inclusive and the campaign was vibrant and competitive. However, further steps could be taken to bring the electoral process closer in line with OSCE commitments, concludes the final report by the OSCE Office for Democratic Institutions and Human Rights (ODIHR).
The report, released on 10 May, notes that overall, the legal framework provided adequate conditions for democratic elections, but the lack of explicit legal provisions for citizen and international election observation needs to be addressed. In practice, however, authorities ensured that the OSCE/ODIHR election expert team had full access to all stages of the electoral process.
According to the report, some other areas would also benefit from improvement. Specifically, the requirement of five years of citizenship to stand as a candidate, as well as the lack of provision to stand independently as candidates, are both at odds with the right of citizens to stand for office without discrimination, as provided for by paragraph 7.5 of the 1990 OSCE Copenhagen Document.
Among the report’s other recommendations is that the current practice of proxy voting should be reconsidered to ensure full compliance with OSCE commitments on the secrecy of the vote.
Read more on this topic
The OSCE bears no responsibility for the accuracy, legality or content of the external links provided.